官术网_书友最值得收藏!

Designing a basic XenApp architecture

Let's learn more about Brick Unit Constructions. The HQ of the company is located near Frederick in Maryland. The company had around 120 users working there. Currently, they have 17 sites under construction around the state located in a 150 mile radius of HQ. Each of these sites has 10 to 25 computers, accessing applications installed on the site server or in each user computer. So we have around 400 users between HQ and the construction sites. Almost 20 percent of these users utilize laptops, work on a few projects at the same time, and travel between sites. All these sites are connected in a MPLS network between HQ and sites using T1 links.

Usually these projects are short-term, between six months to two years. When the project is completed, IT department needs to take a full back up of every machine and the server and reassign them to a new project.

None of these sites has its own IT personnel, so the management of these servers and computers (backups, install new applications, printers, and so on) is centralized from HQ, making the administration very complicated.

Users with laptops are having issues with printers and access to files located on different servers. William wants to resolve these issues moving all data in remote file servers to a centralized file server on a NAS (Network Attached Storage) device, and migrate all printer queues located on remote sites to a new printer server on HQ. The migration of printers will help him to clean up print server drivers and check the compatibility of current printers with XenApp.

The other issue these users are having is related to an in-house developed financial application installed on construction site servers. Users must have these applications installed multiple times (one per site).

The following diagram is the Brick Unit Construction's current infrastructure:

Designing a basic XenApp architecture

William is concerned about the following:

  • Deciding whether he wants to run XenApp on virtual machines or physical servers
  • Budget: The cost of all Remote Desktop Services (Terminal Server) and Citrix licenses will require a large expenditure
  • Virtual machines will provide a lot of benefits, but will require a large investment in a SAN (Storage Area Network), the increase of memory RAM of existing servers and the cost of the virtualization server software

William's idea is to move all applications installed on a client's machine or servers in remote sites to a XenApp farm, migrate all data in these sites to the HQ file and print servers, remove servers from field, and reuse them (these servers are pretty new) to build more XenApp servers or virtualization hosts to run XenApp on virtual machines.

Moving all applications to XenApp will help IT to reduce the license cost of applications and simplify the deployment of new versions and manage applications centrally.

Centralizing all data in a NAS file server will help to reduce backup cost (hardware and software) and simplify administration. Also, it will reduce the time required to restore information.

Currently, the most popular option to implement XenApp 6.5 is using virtual machines and William decided to use it for the deployment of Brick Unit's farm. We are going to learn how to implement XenApp on virtualized environments in Chapter 14, Virtualizing XenApp Farms.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 磐安县| 炉霍县| 鹰潭市| 余江县| 革吉县| 新泰市| 镇原县| 福安市| 正阳县| 黄陵县| 灵石县| 建阳市| 梁山县| 习水县| 西盟| 乾安县| 神农架林区| 贡觉县| 永济市| 泰顺县| 淮南市| 新乡县| 荣成市| 河曲县| 额敏县| 渭源县| 玉山县| 屯门区| 沾益县| 兴国县| 海盐县| 拜城县| 大足县| 政和县| 古交市| 马龙县| 广昌县| 鄯善县| 福清市| 叙永县| 平和县|