官术网_书友最值得收藏!

Using PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper

Imagine you are building a search engine for a retailer website where you need to index fields such as product title, description, sku, category, rating, reviews, and so on. Using a general-purpose analyzer for all these fields may not be the best approach. It would work to some degree but you will soon learn that there are cases where a general-purpose analyzer may return undesired results.

For example, say you have a sku "AB-978" and are using StandardAnalyzer for all fields. The analyzer would break up "AB-978" into two, [ab] [978]. This will have an adverse effect in search accuracy because differences in sku between closely related products may vary very little. We may have another product with sku "AB-978-1". In StandardAnalyzer, both strings would produce these two tokens [ab] [978]. When a user searches for the term "AB-978", both products would be treated with equal weight in the search results. So, there is a possibility that product "AB-978-1" may rank higher than "AB-978" in the search results.

You may be wondering if it's possible to use different analysis processes between fields so we can apply one method on one field and apply another one for a different field. The answer is yes and Lucene provides a per-field analyzer wrapper class to let us achieve that. The PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper constructor accepts two arguments, a default analyzer and a Map of field to analyzer mapping. During the analysis process, if a field is found in the Map, the associated Analyzer will be used. Otherwise, the process will use the default analyzer.

Getting ready

Let's go through an example to demonstrate how PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper works. In our scenario, we will attempt to analyze text on a known field mapped in PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper and analyze the same text on an unmapped field. We will see how the output differs in this exercise.

How to do it…

Here is the code snippet:

  Map<String,Analyzer> analyzerPerField = new HashMap<String,Analyzer>();
  analyzerPerField.put("myfield", new WhitespaceAnalyzer());
  PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper defanalyzer = new PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper(new StandardAnalyzer(), analyzerPerField);
  TokenStream ts = null;
  OffsetAttribute offsetAtt = null;
  CharTermAttribute charAtt = null;
  try {
    ts = defanalyzer.tokenStream("myfield", new StringReader("lucene.apache.org AB-978"));
    offsetAtt = ts.addAttribute(OffsetAttribute.class);
    charAtt = ts.addAttribute(CharTermAttribute.class);
    ts.reset();
    System.out.println("== Processing field 'myfield' using WhitespaceAnalyzer (per field) ==");
    while (ts.incrementToken()) {
      System.out.println(charAtt.toString());
      System.out.println("token start offset: " + offsetAtt.startOffset());
      System.out.println("  token end offset: " + offsetAtt.endOffset());
    }
    ts.end();

    ts = defanalyzer.tokenStream("content", new StringReader("lucene.apache.org AB-978"));
    offsetAtt = ts.addAttribute(OffsetAttribute.class);
    charAtt = ts.addAttribute(CharTermAttribute.class);
    ts.reset();
    System.out.println("== Processing field 'content' using StandardAnalyzer ==");
    while (ts.incrementToken()) {
      System.out.println(charAtt.toString());
      System.out.println("token start offset: " + offsetAtt.startOffset());
      System.out.println("  token end offset: " + offsetAtt.endOffset());
    }
    ts.end();
  }
  catch (IOException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
  }
  finally {
    ts.close();
  }

How it works…

First, we initialize a PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper class with a single field mapping for myfield that maps to a WhitespaceAnalyzer. The default analyzer is set to StandardAnalyzer. Then we go through the usual steps in setting attribute objects for acquiring attributes for OffsetAttribute and CharTermAttribute. We run through the same routine twice, once where we process text in the matching field myfield and a second time where we process text in the non-matching field content. Note that the input string (lucene.apache.org AB-978) for both routines is identical.

When you execute this code, the first routine will output two tokens, [lucene.apache.org] and [AB-978], because WhitespaceAnalyzer was applied. The PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper class found a match in its mapping for the field myfield. In the second routine, three tokens will output instead, [lucene.apache.org] [ab] [978]. The field content was not found, so the default analyzer StandardAnalyzer was applied.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 宜都市| 南召县| 潜山县| 毕节市| 大关县| 萨迦县| 崇左市| 黎川县| 正蓝旗| 东丽区| 驻马店市| 寿宁县| 应用必备| 自贡市| 盘锦市| 南投县| 灵川县| 建昌县| 耒阳市| 江门市| 定兴县| 高安市| 融水| 海丰县| 尼勒克县| 福建省| 克拉玛依市| 桐柏县| 滁州市| 云霄县| 宁化县| 蛟河市| 连南| 呼图壁县| 金乡县| 江津市| 堆龙德庆县| 景东| 南江县| 柳江县| 武义县|