官术网_书友最值得收藏!

  • Lucene 4 Cookbook
  • Edwood Ng Vineeth Mohan
  • 584字
  • 2021-07-16 14:07:50

Using PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper

Imagine you are building a search engine for a retailer website where you need to index fields such as product title, description, sku, category, rating, reviews, and so on. Using a general-purpose analyzer for all these fields may not be the best approach. It would work to some degree but you will soon learn that there are cases where a general-purpose analyzer may return undesired results.

For example, say you have a sku "AB-978" and are using StandardAnalyzer for all fields. The analyzer would break up "AB-978" into two, [ab] [978]. This will have an adverse effect in search accuracy because differences in sku between closely related products may vary very little. We may have another product with sku "AB-978-1". In StandardAnalyzer, both strings would produce these two tokens [ab] [978]. When a user searches for the term "AB-978", both products would be treated with equal weight in the search results. So, there is a possibility that product "AB-978-1" may rank higher than "AB-978" in the search results.

You may be wondering if it's possible to use different analysis processes between fields so we can apply one method on one field and apply another one for a different field. The answer is yes and Lucene provides a per-field analyzer wrapper class to let us achieve that. The PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper constructor accepts two arguments, a default analyzer and a Map of field to analyzer mapping. During the analysis process, if a field is found in the Map, the associated Analyzer will be used. Otherwise, the process will use the default analyzer.

Getting ready

Let's go through an example to demonstrate how PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper works. In our scenario, we will attempt to analyze text on a known field mapped in PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper and analyze the same text on an unmapped field. We will see how the output differs in this exercise.

How to do it…

Here is the code snippet:

  Map<String,Analyzer> analyzerPerField = new HashMap<String,Analyzer>();
  analyzerPerField.put("myfield", new WhitespaceAnalyzer());
  PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper defanalyzer = new PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper(new StandardAnalyzer(), analyzerPerField);
  TokenStream ts = null;
  OffsetAttribute offsetAtt = null;
  CharTermAttribute charAtt = null;
  try {
    ts = defanalyzer.tokenStream("myfield", new StringReader("lucene.apache.org AB-978"));
    offsetAtt = ts.addAttribute(OffsetAttribute.class);
    charAtt = ts.addAttribute(CharTermAttribute.class);
    ts.reset();
    System.out.println("== Processing field 'myfield' using WhitespaceAnalyzer (per field) ==");
    while (ts.incrementToken()) {
      System.out.println(charAtt.toString());
      System.out.println("token start offset: " + offsetAtt.startOffset());
      System.out.println("  token end offset: " + offsetAtt.endOffset());
    }
    ts.end();

    ts = defanalyzer.tokenStream("content", new StringReader("lucene.apache.org AB-978"));
    offsetAtt = ts.addAttribute(OffsetAttribute.class);
    charAtt = ts.addAttribute(CharTermAttribute.class);
    ts.reset();
    System.out.println("== Processing field 'content' using StandardAnalyzer ==");
    while (ts.incrementToken()) {
      System.out.println(charAtt.toString());
      System.out.println("token start offset: " + offsetAtt.startOffset());
      System.out.println("  token end offset: " + offsetAtt.endOffset());
    }
    ts.end();
  }
  catch (IOException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
  }
  finally {
    ts.close();
  }

How it works…

First, we initialize a PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper class with a single field mapping for myfield that maps to a WhitespaceAnalyzer. The default analyzer is set to StandardAnalyzer. Then we go through the usual steps in setting attribute objects for acquiring attributes for OffsetAttribute and CharTermAttribute. We run through the same routine twice, once where we process text in the matching field myfield and a second time where we process text in the non-matching field content. Note that the input string (lucene.apache.org AB-978) for both routines is identical.

When you execute this code, the first routine will output two tokens, [lucene.apache.org] and [AB-978], because WhitespaceAnalyzer was applied. The PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper class found a match in its mapping for the field myfield. In the second routine, three tokens will output instead, [lucene.apache.org] [ab] [978]. The field content was not found, so the default analyzer StandardAnalyzer was applied.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 城步| 虎林市| 芜湖市| 镇江市| 新民市| 会宁县| 襄城县| 绥中县| 灵川县| 鲜城| 玉山县| 晋城| 钟祥市| 朝阳市| 牡丹江市| 东至县| 景洪市| 海晏县| 佳木斯市| 内乡县| 中山市| 珠海市| 普格县| 香河县| 唐山市| 平谷区| 葵青区| 大兴区| 娱乐| 张北县| 长顺县| 荔浦县| 宿州市| 巢湖市| 安达市| 福海县| 临颍县| 松江区| 外汇| 建水县| 新乡县|