官术网_书友最值得收藏!

The data volume

A company can easily have thousands to millions of IoT devices with several sensors on each unit, each sensor reporting values on a regular basis. The inflow of data can grow quite large very quickly. Since IoT devices send data on an ongoing basis, the volume of data in total can increase much faster than many companies are used to.

To demonstrate how this can happen, imagine a company that manufactures small monitoring devices. It produces 12,000 devices a year, starting in 2010 when the product was launched. Each one is tested at the end of assembly and the values reported by the sensors on the device are kept for analysis for five years. The data growth looks like the following image:

A chart showing data storage needs for production snapshot of 200 KB and 1,000 units per month. Five years of production data is kept

Now, imagine the device also had internet connectivity to track sensor values, and each one remains connected for two years. Since the data inflow continues well after the devices are built, data growth is exponential until it stabilizes when older devices stop reporting values. This looks more like the blue area in the following chart:

Chart shows the addition of IoT data at 0.5 KB per message, 10 messages per day. Devices are connected for two years from production

In order to illustrate how large this can get, consider the following example. If you capture 10 messages per day and the message size is half of a full production snapshot, by 2017, data storage requirements would be over 1,500 times higher than production-only data.

For many companies, this introduces some problems. The database software, storage infrastructure, and available computing horsepower is not typically intended to handle this kind of growth. The licensing agreements with software vendors tends to be tied to the number of servers and CPU cores. Storage is handled by standard backup planning and retention policies.

The data volume rapidly leads to computing and storage requirements well beyond what can be held by a single server. It gets cost prohibitive very quickly under traditional architectures to distribute it across hundreds or thousands of servers. To do the best analytics, you need lots of historical data, and since you are unlikely to know ahead of time which data is most predictive, you have to keep as much as you can on hand.

With large-scale data, computing horsepower requirements for analytics are not very predictable and change dramatically depending on the question being asked. Analytic needs are very elastic. Traditional server planning ratchets up on premise resources with the anticipated number of servers needed to meet peak needs determined in advance. Doubling compute power in a short amount of time, if even possible, is very expensive.

IoT data volumes and computing resource requirements can quickly outpace all the other company data needs combined.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 青田县| 黄龙县| 浠水县| SHOW| 青岛市| 福泉市| 五莲县| 武穴市| 石城县| 荆州市| 海宁市| 黎川县| 方正县| 海城市| 突泉县| 垦利县| 大理市| 东源县| 定陶县| 临汾市| 夏河县| 凌海市| 花垣县| 东丰县| 安龙县| 丹阳市| 玛沁县| 廊坊市| 吴川市| 岚皋县| 密山市| 蓬安县| 北安市| 衡南县| 石棉县| 措美县| 德阳市| 博湖县| 安徽省| 新安县| 井冈山市|