官术网_书友最值得收藏!

Providers

For completeness, it is worthwhile to point out that there is a natural bulkhead between cloud providers. All cloud providers will have outages, but the likelihood that they will have simultaneous outages is low. In the context of polyglot cloud, where each component selects the most appropriate provider based on its needs, this simply means that when one provider has an outage then the components running on the other providers will not be affected. Maybe there is an argument to be made that your components should be well diversified across providers, but that is not the objective of polyglot cloud. On the other end of the spectrum, multi-cloud suggests running components redundantly across multiple providers to achieve high availability during an outage. I will wager that maybe 1% of companies have maybe 1% of their workloads which might benefit from all the extra elbow grease that is needed to achieve this type of topology. For the overwhelming majority of us, multi-regional deployments are quite sufficient. Regardless, in cloud-native systems these decisions are made on a component-by-component basis.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 安多县| 大安市| 沙雅县| 酉阳| 安义县| 毕节市| 汝南县| 镇平县| 墨江| 饶河县| 洛阳市| 富裕县| 白山市| 丰都县| 辽源市| 资阳市| 多伦县| 洛南县| 越西县| 汶上县| 碌曲县| 定南县| 崇州市| 白银市| 襄汾县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 油尖旺区| 郯城县| 柳州市| 高台县| 科尔| 嘉义市| 宜兰县| 双峰县| 海南省| 尼木县| 论坛| 司法| 馆陶县| 台中县| 十堰市|