官术网_书友最值得收藏!

二、專注

在分析討論之前,我想先問一下考生:

“優秀的文章一般都符合哪幾個標準呢?”

可能大家會覺得這個問題很奇怪,因為文章的類型不同,其目標和功能就不同,所以衡量的標準自然也千差萬別。但是,我想大家應該都會贊同一個說法——一篇優秀的文章應該能夠用最少、最精確的文字來達到預期的表達效果。如說明文要將說明對象有順序地逐步展開;記敘文應交代清楚事件所發生的過程及其影響;議論文應依照邏輯層層論證某個觀點等。而這些表象反映出來的本質大體是相同的,總結起來就是3個標準:內容簡潔、中心明確以及語言考究。“內容簡潔”指的是言簡意賅,字字珠璣;“中心明確”指的是文章圍繞一個中心論點而展開;“語言考究”指的是詞匯豐富且措辭精準。毫無疑問,語言方面功力的提升需要長期的積累和沉淀,所以該標準很難通過短期的訓練而實現。相比之下,其他兩個標準——“內容簡潔”和“中心明確”則相對簡單許多了,只要勤加訓練就可以做到。再告訴大家一個事實吧,若是能以最少的文字來準確表達文章主旨,那么即使語言方面不夠出彩,也可以得到一個不錯的托福寫作分數。

雖然“內容簡潔”和“中心明確”看起來是兩個不同的方面,但二者卻密切相關。為什么呢?因為要做到簡潔,就必須先有一個明確的中心論點,否則就是諸多信息的胡亂堆砌,毫無目標和方向可言,也就難免冗長且混亂了。因此討論信息的收集時,在“專注”這個部分我將重點從“內容簡潔”和“中心明確”這兩個角度展開分析(注意:在接下來的學習過程中,大家要把握好這一點,記得我們是從不同角度解析同一個問題)。

(一)內容簡潔

西方人認為好文章應該符合6個“c”的標準——“concise”(簡潔)、“clear”(清晰)、“complete”(完整)、“consistent”(一致)、“correct”(正確)和“colorful”(生動)。“concise”不僅位列其中,還居于首位。知名劇作家安東·巴甫洛維奇·契訶夫(Anton Pavlovich Chekhov)也曾經說過“Brevity is the sister of talent”(簡潔是天才的姊妹),簡潔的重要性從中可見一斑。此外,亨利·戴維·梭羅(Henry David Thoreau)的一番話同樣值得我們細細品味:“Not that the story need be long, but it will take a long while to make it short”(并非故事本身要長,而是將它縮短需要花費很長一段時間)。內容簡潔會使文章提升一個層次,而寫作的功力也能從中體現出來。

但這并不是說,大家寫文章的時候字數越少越好,要知道簡潔必須建立在文章傳達正確意義的基礎上,千萬不能走極端,不可以為了追求絕對的簡潔而故意省略一些必不可少的重要信息。

我們先看一個小段落,然后再來討論到底怎樣才是簡潔但不簡單的文字。

案例分析

PASSAGE EXCERPT:“One of the most puzzling aspects of the paintings is their location. Other rock paintings—for example, those of Bushmen in South Africa—are either located near cave entrances or completely in the open. Cave paintings in France and Spain, however, are in recesses and caverns far removed from original cave entrances.This means that artists were forced to work in cramped spaces and without sources of natural light. It also implies that whoever made them did not want them to be easily found. Since cave dwellers normally lived close to entrances, there must have been some reason why so many generations of Lascaux cave dwellers hid their art.”

Online Test: Lascaux Cave Paintings

全文及相應譯文見免費共享資料“黃金閱讀”

這段文字節選自托福的一篇閱讀文章,ETS在這里設置了考題,可見它的重要性非同一般。這段文字是經過精心構造并且斟酌的詞句,所以無疑也是一個極其優秀的寫作范例。有些考生可能會很納悶:

“文勇老師,你到底想干什么?為什么要額外強調一篇托福閱讀文章呢?我們現在不是在一起討論寫作的事情嗎?”

其實不管是閱讀還是寫作,無非都是信息的吸收或者呈現。閱讀的時候,我們的重心是理解并分析別人寫出來的優秀文章,而寫作的時候,我們的目標則是寫出一篇讓別人讀起來喜歡的、同樣優秀的文章。顯然,“閱讀”與“寫作”二者事實上是相通的,都關乎好文章的重要事項。在寫作的開始階段,我還沒有要求大家去做大量的練習,畢竟有效的實踐是建立在扎實且準確的理論基礎上的。所以我們先來分析一下ETS出品的權威范文——考試的閱讀文章,這樣能少走一些彎路。

我想帶著各位一起來分析文中明顯標記出來的那句話“This means that artists were forced to work in cramped spaces and without sources of natural light”(這意味著藝術家們被迫在狹小的空間里工作,并且沒有自然光源)。根據這句話,ETS出了一道推理題,問我們能從這句話中得出什么推論。正確答案是“They developed their own sources of light to use while painting”(他們自己研制出了在繪畫時所需要的光源)。

這樣的解題過程思路很清晰,大家也都容易接受。講到這里,關于這篇閱讀文章本可以畫上句號了,但是我想針對這個題目深入地多想一個層次。因為文章里講的是他們在狹小的、沒有自然光源的地方來畫畫,所以我就推理出“他們技藝精湛,爐火純青,即使沒有光也能照常工作”。可能有些考生聽完我的想法之后覺得好像也說得通,于是動搖了。事實上,我剛才隨口提出的疑問是可以通過對文章的分析給予解答的,通過文中那句話是絕對不可能得出“摸黑畫畫”這個結論的。為什么呢?因為作者悄悄使用了“natural”這個詞來修飾“light”,而這個單詞的出現表明這句話必定有言外之意。

“文勇老師,那到底有什么玄機呢?好深奧啊。”

其實優秀的文章都有一個共性——字字珠璣,而這才是真正意義上的簡潔。每個組成部分都各司其職,不可取代。

在解釋“natural”之前,我們先來看幾個生活中的例子吧,一起體會語言之妙。

案例一

如果我問A:“嘿,哥們!你身上帶錢了嗎?”他回答說:“哎喲,我今兒沒帶人民幣。”那我聽完之后會是怎樣的感覺呢?“小樣兒,那你是不是帶美元了啊?”

案例二

如果我問B:“哥們,你喜歡汽車嗎?”他回答說:“我不喜歡低檔次的車。”那我就會認為“好吧,你是有錢人,只喜歡高檔次的車。”

上面兩個對話很類似,它們反映出了一個有關簡潔的問題,這意味著:在一篇追求簡潔的優秀文章中,被額外修飾與強調的概念是值得關注的。所以只要遇到被特意強調的概念,大家就要格外留意,思考一下言外之意是什么。對于“錢”這個整體概念,如果單獨強調了“人民幣”,那就意味著可能還會涉及其他幣種;對于“汽車”這個泛指的概念,如果刻意強調了“低檔次”,那就意味著可能還需要考慮其他檔次的車。也就是說,只要涉及了某特定分類,我們就要留意與之相關的其他分類。

這時候大家重新思考一下關于“cave painting”的那句話,尤其是后半句“without sources of natural light”,注意這里的修飾成分“natural”,特意強調了分類的概念,那么我們就要想一下與之相關的其他類別,顯然與“自然光源”相對的就是“人造光源”,也就是最終的答案——“雖然黑漆漆的狹小洞穴中沒有‘自然光源’,但是他們研制出了其他可用的光源”。現在各位明白了吧?起初我故意忽略了“natural”,蠻橫地將“without sources of natural light”(沒有自然光源)縮減為“without sources of light”(沒有光源),而“沒有光源”當然就意味著“在黑暗中進行了”。如果文章真的想表達“他們學會了摸黑畫畫”這個意思,那么根本就沒必要再強調“natural”這個概念了。在這種文章的目標之下,“natural”這個單詞的出現是一種冗余現象,應該被刪除。也就是說,一篇優秀文章中的每一個單詞其實都承載著作者的某種特殊用意,可能暗示著某些重要信息。對此,大家需要額外留心,讀懂其言外之意。

通常提到“簡潔”時,大部分人想到的只是避免詞句方面的重復,用最少的詞語表達同樣完整的意思。常見的例子是“I like the wine produced in France”表達效果就不及“I like French wine”。但在這里,我所論述的簡潔概念不僅僅是避免重復。現在是時候告訴諸位我的中心論點了:

簡潔并不意味著“句子短,文字少”,而是要保證自己筆下的每一個單詞和每一個信息都承載著無法取代的獨特使命,做到“不冗余,有所指”。

以上例子是詞句層面的“簡潔”,在段落和篇章層面上,同樣也要爭取做到不累贅、不煩瑣。也就是說,整篇文章中的每句話、每個或大或小的段落乃至整篇文章的組織結構都要做到簡潔,這就意味著應該做到“規避冗余,字字珠璣”。下面我們分別看一些例子。

1. 詞句層面

我們來看一個在詞句層面上做到簡潔的具體案例吧。

案例分析

PASSAGE EXCERPT: “Oil pools are valuable underground accumulations of oil, and oil fields are regions underlain by one or more oil pools. When an oil pool or field has been discovered, wells are drilled into the ground. Permanent towers, called derricks, used to be built to handle the long sections of drilling pipe. Now portable drilling machines are set up and are then dismantled and removed. When the well reaches a pool, oil usually rises up the well because of its density difference with water beneath it or because of the pressure of expanding gas trapped above it. Although this rise of oil is almost always carefully controlled today, spouts of oil, or gushers, were common in the past. Gas pressure gradually dies out, and oil is pumped from the well. Water or steam may be pumped down adjacent wells to help push the oil out. At a refinery, the crude oil from underground is separated into natural gas, gasoline, kerosene, and various oils. Petrochemicals such as dyes, fertilizer, and plastic are also manufactured from the petroleum.”

TPO-4: Petroleum Resources

全文及相應譯文見免費共享資料“黃金閱讀”

Which of the following can be inferred from this paragraph about gushers?

A. They make bringing the oil to the surface easier.

B. They signal the presence of huge oil reserves.

C. They waste more oil than they collect.

D. They are unlikely to occur nowadays.

該文章節選自閱讀部分,我們先來關注包含出題點的那個句子吧:“Although this rise of oil is almost always carefully controlled today, spouts of oil, or gushers, were common in the past.”整句話的意思是“盡管現在石油的上升已經可以得到很好的控制了,但在過去,井噴時常發生”。題目問的是通過這句話能推斷出關于“gushers”(噴油井)的哪些信息,正確答案是D選項“They are unlikely to occur nowadays”(如今它們出現的幾率很小)。這時候各位應該反應過來了,文中講的是“… gushers were common in the past”,它特意強調了時間概念“in the past”,指出“過去的時候它們很稀松平常”,那么隱含之意就是“現在情況大不同了,幾乎沒有”。這樣來看,答案和原文配合得天衣無縫,順理成章。

接下來,我們再分析一個在詞句層面簡潔但不簡單的例子。

案例分析

PASSAGE EXCERPT: “The Whigs, in contrast, viewed government power positively. They believed that it should be used to protect individual rights and public liberty, and that it had a special role where individual effort was ineffective. By regulating the economy and competition, the government could ensure equal opportunity. Indeed, for Whigs the concept of government promoting the general welfare went beyond the economy. In particular, Whigs in the northern sections of the United States also believed that government power should be used to foster the moral welfare of the country. They were much more likely to favor social-reform legislation and aid to education.”

OG Practice Test 1: Nineteenth-Century Politics in the United States

全文及相應譯文見免費共享資料“黃金閱讀”

Which of the following can be inferred from this paragraph about variations in political beliefs within the Whig Party?

A. They were focused on issues of public liberty.

B. They caused some members to leave the Whig party.

C. They were unimportant to most Whigs.

D. They reflected regional interests.

和上一個案例很類似,這依舊是選自托福閱讀文章的一道推理題。先看關鍵句“In particular, Whigs in the northern sections of the United States also believed that government power should be used to foster the moral welfare of the country”,意思是“特別是美國北部的輝格黨認為政府應該促進國家的道德福利建設”。而題目問的是文章中關于輝格黨內部政治觀念多樣性的認識,正確答案是D選項“They reflected regional interests”(這種多樣性表明了不同地區的利益問題)。有些考生可能就納悶了:這和地區差異有什么關系呢?文中提到了這是美國北部(northern)的輝格黨所持的觀點,在一篇優秀的ETS文章中,必然會做到簡潔,而其中又強調了“northern”這個地理位置的概念,于是這就說明了暗分類的存在:既然有“北部”,也就肯定會有與之對應的“南部”,而且二者觀點肯定不同,否則就沒必要進行區分了,所以文章暗含不同地區的利益問題。

講了這么多,我只想證明一件事情,諸如“in the past”和“in the northern sections”等被強調的細節信息用得恰到好處,簡單、精練、不可或缺,這就是我所推崇的簡潔。以后各位寫文章的時候應努力保證筆下的每一個單詞都有自身承載的特定意義,若沒有就是冗余,果斷刪掉,爭取做到字字珠璣。

2. 段落層面

我們來看下面的段落,看看它是否做到了簡潔:With the better understanding and accepting ability to the switching modern tech, we teenagers are the experts of its products. I recall a funny video clip about how the old and the young generations treat the new digital product differently: a girl asks her grandfather how he feels about his iPad while he is busy cutting vegetable on the very machine, then washing it with running tap water and putting it back into the cabinet. He totally treats the tablet computer which allows people to work, educate, and entertain with just their fingers as an iron-hard anvil.(年輕人對于日新月異的當代科技有著更好的理解能力和接受能力,他們可謂是科技產品專家。我想起了一段有趣的關于新老兩代如何對待新型電子產品的視頻片段:一個女孩問她祖父是否喜歡他的iPad,而她祖父正忙著在那臺機器上切菜,然后用流動的自來水把它沖洗干凈,并放到柜子里。他完全把僅僅是動動手指就可以讓人們工作、學習甚至娛樂的平板電腦當作鐵一般堅硬的砧板。)

一定會有考生說:

“文勇老師,這個段落一點都不簡潔,尤其是最后一句,因為明明用一個iPad就足夠了,作者非要啰里吧唆地說上一堆:the tablet computer which allows people to work, educate, and entertain with just their fingers。”

果真是這樣嗎?我們來思考一下“the tablet computer which allows people to work, educate, and entertain with just their fingers”這些內容在文中的作用是什么。沒錯,就是要突出強調iPad這種先進電子產品的強大之處,從而與前文祖父的做法形成鮮明對比。“tablet computer”說明了iPad方便易攜帶;“allows people to work, educate, and entertain”說明了iPad所具備的功能;“with just their fingers”說明了操作之簡便。每一個詞都有所指,整個段落沒有冗余的成分,所以,這不是不簡潔,這是在特定場景、特殊目的下的有意為之。

但是,如果某位考生在寫作文的時候,他并不需要特別強調iPad的這些優勢,卻同樣大書特書,就會給人不簡潔的印象。如這樣一組對話:A問:“你喜歡花兒嗎?”真實的情況是B的確不喜歡花兒,但如果這時候從B口中冒出的答案是“我不喜歡裝飾用的假花”,那么就會出問題了。因為這種回答是帶有暗含信息的,容易讓人錯誤地理解為“B確實喜歡花兒,但只鐘情于鮮花”。這樣一來說話人所描述的情況就與事實不相符了,交流就不順暢了。寫文章也是一樣,如果沒有特別的目標,那么簡潔是第一要素,千萬不要過多強調一些限定成分,給人以錯覺。

3. 篇章層面

篇章層面的簡潔其實就是合理組織文章結構。最常見的是“essay map”,即在一篇文章的開頭段中把下文即將闡述的理由用簡潔的詞語概括出來,一般會在首段預告一下下文的2~3個分論點會從哪些角度出發來支持論證這篇文章的核心論點,其好處在于提前在讀者的腦海中勾勒出全文的框架,使得文章前后呼應,結構緊密,給人一種“well-organized”的感覺。

我們來看一個寫作中關于“essay map”的例子。

題目:

Which would you choose: a high-paying job with long hours that would give you little time with family and friends or a lower-paying job with shorter hours that would give you more time with family and friends? Explain your choice, using specific reasons and details.

TOEFL: 2006.7.29/2007.10.20

文章:

Everyone likes to have good times with family and friends but to make this the most important aspect in one's life is shortsighted and the quality of the “enjoyment” would be less varied and interesting if the job were not high-paying. I would choose a high-paying job with long hours because such a job has much greater long-term benefits for my family, for others and for myself.

In the first place, high pay means that I could provide a better life for my family—a good home, plenty of food, nice clothes, nice birthday presents and money for my children's education. These factors are more important than a few more hours a week to spend with family if it meant, for instance that I could not send my kid to a good school or pay for needed medical treatments. And high pay also means that my wife would not need to work and she could spend more time caring for the children and giving them a good life.

Also, with a good paying job, despite the long hours, I could also be more generous with my friends and with needy people. The guy who has an easy job with lots of free time but little money cannot help himself in a crisis and much less his friends, his family and the needy who enter his life.

Lastly, with a good job, I could save up money for a good retirement and then have lots of leisure time to enjoy a more active social life. And I would also be able to be generous with my grandchildren then. I would be very happy to experience such pleasure.

So, in order to provide a good life for my family, enable my wife to concentrate on the family, have an enjoyable retirement and be a responsible, generous person, I would definitely choose the high-paying long-hour job.

《新托福真題詳解——寫作分卷(第一冊)》

文章首段的第一句話先寫一般人的觀點,然后提出自己的觀點“I would choose a high-paying job with long hours”,并從三方面給出這樣選擇的原因:“for my family, for others and for myself”。注意,這里的三點實際上就是前面提到的“essay map”。接著文章的第二、三、四段分別從這三方面進行了詳細的闡述,使得全文前后呼應,結構渾然一體。

“文勇老師,這不過是結構上安排得巧妙罷了,跟簡潔又有什么關系呢?”

事實上,這代表了簡潔的更高層次。文章開頭提到的內容既清晰地暗示了全文結構,又能保證后文中有相關的段落來進行對應和印證,符合“專注”這一原則,且每一個段落都是有目的地提供信息給讀者,體現了“簡潔”。

小貼士

需要注意的是,考試的時候對于字數是有一些硬性規定的,那我們要做的就是在保證數量的基礎上逐步提升品質,這就需要我們好好修煉了。但是大家也不要太有壓力,我之所以講這么多危言聳聽的話,并且提出略顯嚴苛的要求,其實目的只有一個——提醒各位謹慎下筆,要比過去任何時候都更重視寫作,甚至在心里應該有“將我的文章拿去給別的考生做閱讀題目”這樣的想法,然后猜想:“別人看到我在文中隨手提及的時間點、地點,甚至只是對一件事情的簡單形容時,會有怎樣的感受呢?”有這樣的心理預期之后,大家就會從一個全新的視角來看待這個考試中的重頭戲——寫作了。要合格做到“簡潔”這一點,一開始的時候可能會有些難度,大家可能會忽視一些細節,依舊犯一些錯誤,不過沒關系,至少心中應該牢牢樹立這個堅定的目標,爭取盡快達成。

(二)中心明確

前面強調過“寫文章要簡潔”,并且提到要做到簡潔,避免畫蛇添足地寫一些多余的內容,首先就要有一個明確的中心論點,然后讓其他論據和分論點都來為中心論點服務,也就是要爭取做到“unity”和“consistency”。

1. 兩個要求:統一性(unity)和一致性(consistency)

雖然“統一性”(unity)和“一致性”(consistency)在定義上不太相同,但是二者的關系卻密不可分,因此在這里我將二者放在一塊兒進行討論。

“統一性”(unity)指的是整篇文章圍繞一個中心論點來展開;“一致性”(consistency)指的是整篇文章從頭到尾所有的論證過程(包括分論點和論據)要非常一致地朝一個共同的方向努力,即支持并證明已有的中心論點。

具體來講,寫文章的時候我們應該做到三點:

(1)中心論點明確且與題目統一一致(緊密扣題)

(2)分論點與中心論點統一一致(圍繞中心論點)

(3)分論點的具體論證與分論點統一一致

當文章的中心論點很明確的時候,我們能更好地保證所寫的例證和分論點都不會跑題,而也只有當所有的句子和段落都不偏離主題時,才能真正實現篇章層面上的簡潔。

要達到以上這個要求,首先應該對自己說這樣一句話:“My purpose is to _____ my audience that _____.”寫一篇文章的時候心中應該明確寫作目的,即自己所要證明的觀點或者論述的事情,這一點毫無疑問。可是除此之外,我還要強調:不僅僅是文章層面上,其實寫每一個段落、每一句話甚至是每一個單詞的時候都應該反復多遍地回答上面這個填空題,以便明確每一個步驟的獨特意義(雖然這是一個非常土的方法,但是很實用,它可保證目標明確,思路不迷失,文字不冗余)。

題目:

Some people think they can solve important problems by themselves or with the help of their families, so they do not need help from the government.

文章:

Can we solve significant issues with our own ability? Opinions on this matter vary. Some people think that they can handle important problems by themselves or with the help of their families. Others think that they can by no means deal with all problems. Personally, I stand in line with the latter point of view, as there are many roles of the government that cannot be displaced by any individual.

Firstly, the government constructs infrastructure, such as transportation routes, which is critical for people's convenience. Any civilization cannot last for long without well-developed transportation. The government who has the right to use all sorts of powerful resources such as millions of dollars or the best engineers can manage to build the net of traffic to connect one place to another. This traffic net, ranging from interstate highways to town-to-town airline, guarantees our modern lifestyle for the convenience it offers. From my experience, born in a suburban community, I often recall the memory that my parents drove me to school in the downtown, and this distance took us as long as two hours with the poor road condition. Since the government constructed an express way five years ago, we only need less an hour on this trip.

Secondly, the government provides people with a huge number of public services which they cannot live without,like education, medical treatment, security and so on. The government not only founds hospitals but also runs medical insurance to ensure people's health and medical treatment with less money spent from their own bill.

Thirdly, the government can offer assistance in extreme circumstances, especially when people are stricken by a disaster. There are some significant incidents which we cannot get rid of by ourselves, such as earthquakes, tsunamis or volcano eruptions. One of these tragic events in China in the recent decade is the earthquake in Wenchuan, Sichuan Province in 2008, causing seventy thousand deaths. People who went through this tragedy were aided by the government who helped them to stay safe and healthy, to find their loved ones in rubble, and later to reconstruct their home. Obviously, when people run into some unpredictable and catastrophic happenings, they cannot leave government's help.

With all the reasons and evidences presented above, it is abundantly clear that the government plays an indispensible role in the life of every member of the society. In the face of some difficulties, people are not able to live without the help from the government.

樂聞攜爾學生原作

這是一篇學生的習作。作文題目講的是“有些人覺得憑借自己以及家人的力量足以應付一些重大問題,不必非得政府出面解決”。看完文章的第一段,我們會發現這篇文章對題目持反對觀點,它認可政府所發揮的不可替代的作用。接下來給出了三個分論點,大寫特寫政府的光輝形象,夸獎它的非凡功績。最后是總結部分,呼應首段。

大家覺得這篇文章寫得好嗎?看上去很美。但還記得我提出的那個標準嗎?檢查的時候其實只需要不厭其煩地問“段落的中心是否與文章的中心一致”。我們一起來分析一下這篇文章吧。首段提出中心論點“個體的力量有限,政府的許多角色不可取代”,目標很明確,根據題目拋出的主題確定了全文的立場和方向,這里沒有問題。主要是正文的論述部分有些跑偏了,作者給出的幾個分論點“目標”(purpose)都是在“夸政府如何強大”,沒有列出“重要問題”(important problems)來證明政府所做的事情的重要性,也沒有將“政府力量”和“個體力量”(individuals themselves)進行對比,使得正文的論述與題目主題和首段提出的中心論點產生了偏差。雖然用了很多的筆墨和篇幅,但是作者其實只討論了中心論點三分之一的元素,違背了我們剛提到的兩個原則——“統一性”(unity)和“一致性”(consistency)。這時候大家就明白了,這原來是一篇有缺陷的、不太值得學習的文章。

其實,這篇文章的作者寫作功底還是不錯的,如果關注到行文過程中各部分的目標,稍作修改,就可以成就一篇高分作文,下面我們就來看看如何針對我們剛才的分析中提到的毛病進行修改:

Can we solve significant issues with our own ability? Opinions on this matter vary. Some people think that they can handle important problems by themselves or with the help of their families. Others think that they can by no means deal with all problems. Personally, I stand in line with the latter point of view, as there are many roles of the government that cannot be displaced by any individual.

Firstly, the government constructs infrastructure, such as transportation routes, which is critical for people's convenience. Any civilization cannot last for long without well-developed transportation. which is critical to the well-being of its people.(突出重要)The government who has the right has the advantage over individuals (突出與個體力量對比的優勢)to use all sorts of powerful resources such as millions of dollars or the best engineers can manage to build the net of traffic to connect one place to another. This traffic net, ranging from interstate highways to town-to-town airline, guarantees our modern lifestyle for the convenience it offers we rely on in modern life.(突出重要) From my experience, born in a suburban community, I often recall the memory that my parents drove me to school in the downtown, and this distance took us as long as two hours with the poor road condition. Since the government constructed an express way five years ago, we only need less an hour on this trip. This immensely improved my family's living standard, considering how much time saved for other meaningful activities.(突出重要)And for sure, we, by ourselves, could never accomplish such a big project.(突出與個體力量對比)

Secondly, the government provides people a huge number of public services which they cannot live without,like education, medical treatment, security and so on. The government not only founds hospitals but also run medical insurance to ensure people's health and medical treatment with less money spent from their own bill. These important services require wide and huge collection of money that few individuals could have the ability or credential to afford.(突出與個體力量對比)

Thirdly, the government can offer assistance in extreme circumstances, especially when people are stricken by a disaster. There are some significant incidents which we cannot get rid of by ourselves, such as earthquakes, tsunamis or, volcano eruptions. One of these tragic events in China in the recent decade is the earthquake in Wenchuan, Sichuan Province in 2008, causing seventy thousand deaths. People who went through this tragedy were aided by the government who helped them to stay safe and healthy, to find their loved ones in rubble, and later to reconstruct their home. Obviously, when people run into some unpredictable and catastrophic happenings, they cannot leave government's help.

With all the reasons and evidences presented above, it is abundantly clear that the government plays an indispensible role in the life of every member of the society. In the face of some difficulties, people are not able to live without the help from the government.

樂聞攜爾學生習作課后修改版本

事實上,在不斷回答文章各組成部分的“purpose”這個過程中,我們會客觀且理性地審視行文思路是否合理,從而理順邏輯;判斷某個部分是否篇幅過長,從而避免出現冗余的情況。相信我,這絕對是一個可以讓人受益終身的建議,考試的時候有助于大家寫出條理清晰的文章,更重要的是有助于大家培養更為嚴謹的思維習慣。最后,請大家與我一起溫習一下這句非常重要的、應該在行文過程中反復提醒自己的句子吧:

My purpose is to _____ my audience that _____.

2. 兩種寫作方式:讓步寫法和居中寫法

當我強調“明確的中心論點”這個概念的時候,特別擔心大家會狹義地將“明確”的觀點完全等同于“一邊倒”的觀點。以托福獨立寫作題目為例,ETS一般都會問“Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A”。一般來說,大家心目中明確的觀點可能就是“我同意A”或者“我反對A”。而當我們寫同意A的文章時,肯定就要極力呈現A的諸多優點;反之,當文章持堅決反對的態度時,則會瘋狂地列舉出A的種種缺點。雖然這兩種寫法都符合“中心論點明確”這個原則,卻都過于極端,屬于“一邊倒”的情形。

事實上,生活中的事物都是較為復雜的。有些事物具有兩面性,優缺點并存,如大家都聽過的“科學是把雙刃劍”,科學可以提高人類的生活質量,但也會帶來環境問題,進而降低人類的生活質量。而有些事物本身是中性的,只代表客觀情況,它們給人帶來的或好或壞的影響完全取決于其他外部條件,如“電視給社會帶來正面還是負面影響”這一話題。要知道,電視本身是沒有意識的,它不會主動地影響人們以至于社會,實際上在影響大眾的是通過電視傳播信息或內容的人,《SAT官方指南》中有一篇文章形象地稱這些人為“wire-puller”(幕后操控者),當這些人希望通過電視這一媒體傳遞正能量時,電視就可以給社會帶來正面影響,通過積極向上的教育節目,觀眾可以了解更多知識,從而樹立正確的價值觀和人生觀。如紅遍全球的《荒野求生》(Man vs. Wild),該節目不僅介紹了很多求生知識和技巧,也讓人們認識到了大自然的殘酷與無情、人力的渺小。通過觀看這一節目,很多人都會放棄之前“想要冒險,挑戰自然”這種單純幼稚的想法。但是,當幕后操控者希望利用電視達到某一負面目的時,電視對觀眾的負面影響也不容小覷。如《意志的勝利》(Triumph of the Will)這一部在第二次世界大戰期間拍攝的電影就是納粹政府用來煽動群眾,向他們灌輸納粹思想的,其危害不言而喻。

對于前者——具有兩面性的事物,我們可以有所側重地論述其中的一面,但是也要注意文章觀點的完整性,不能為了重點突出它的優點而完全忽略它的缺點,或是為了強調它的缺點而從頭到尾對它的優點只字不提,這樣的做法是不理智的,大家要爭取兩方面都兼顧:表揚完以后也順帶列一下它的不足之處;批評完以后再補充一兩句它的優點。

而對于中性的事物,我們亦不可摒棄“具體情況,具體分析”的原則,如果忽視其他影響因素和外部條件而簡單地將其歸類到或好或壞的行列都是不合適的。事實上,寫文章要嚴謹,而某物一定好或一定壞的片面文章顯然是不夠嚴謹的。

那么,如何才能同時做到“觀點明確”且“嚴謹不極端”呢?在這里,我給大家推薦兩種寫作方式——“讓步寫法”和“居中寫法”。

(1)讓步寫法

“讓步寫法”在寫作中很常見,一般是在文章開頭或結尾部分承認文章的主觀點有一定的不足之處,并解釋一下不足如何瑕不掩瑜或說明一下克服不足的方法,使得文章的整體論述趨于客觀和完整。當某一論述對象本身具有兩面性時,“讓步寫法”不失為一種很好的寫作方式。例如我們在寫托福作文的時候,一般主體部分會采用“三段論”的形式——兩段正面描述加一段包含負面描述的“讓步段”,或者兩段負面描述加一段包含正面描述的“讓步段”。

換句話說,對某個論述對象先大夸特夸一番,為了避免將其表揚得過了頭,在最后的部分收一收,提一下“當然它也不是完美和絕對正確的”,再列舉幾個無傷大雅的小缺點;或是對某個論述對象大肆貶低一頓后,為了防止太過極端,所以在最后的部分也提一下“當然它也有一定的優點和可取之處”。這是大家喜聞樂見的一種做法,很多老師也建議學生寫文章的時候采用讓步方法,這樣能體現我們的辯證思維,對于問題的分析和認識也更客觀、成熟且全面。

那么怎樣的情況最適合“讓步寫法”呢?一般情況下,當想要論述一個事物的優點大于其自身的缺點(或反之,缺點大于優點)時,或者當想要描述一個事物的優點/缺點大于另外一個事物的優點/缺點(兩個事物進行比較)時,建議大家最好采用“讓步寫法”。

具體應該如何操作呢?不妨先給大家分析一個寫作題目吧:“Is travelling in a group led by a tour guide the best way to travel?”在開始動筆之前,各位需要思考清楚如下幾個問題:

● 該題目中是否存在暗含的比較對象?

● 如果存在,那么二者相比,更傾向于哪一個?

● 討論對象一有哪些優點?

● 討論對象二有哪些優點?

顯然這個題目中確實存在暗含的比較對象——跟團旅游與自己旅游。假如我們更傾向于“自己旅游”,那么中心論點其實就是對“跟團旅游”的否定,告訴讀者它并不是最好的選擇。接下來開始進入論證階段,先讓步,簡單羅列“跟團旅游”的一兩個優點,然后立地反擊,表明盡管“跟團旅游”具備一定的優勢,但在某些方面它卻比不上“自己旅游”。后面可以分兩段詳細論述一下“自己旅游”的顯著特色(各位心里要清楚,肯定“自己旅游”這種方式的同時其實也就是在指出“跟團旅游”的不足之處,所以請不要列舉雙方共有的優點),最后得出結論:“跟團旅游并不是最好的旅行方式,自己旅游會是個不錯的選擇。”這就是大體的寫作思路,而結構方面可以參考“首尾段+中間三段論(即三個自然段)”的模式。

除了上面這種論證方式,中間主體段落也可以先詳細論述“自己旅游”的鮮明優勢,而后在此基礎上進行讓步,說明“盡管如此,自己旅游在某些方面卻不及跟團旅游”,然后寫“跟團旅游”的一兩個優點,最后依然得出同樣的結論——跟團旅游是一種不錯的方式,但稱不上是最好的,因為自己旅游也好處多多。

“讓步寫法”涉及兩個相比較的事物,其中一個事物的優點往往會是另一個事物的缺點,反之亦然,所以二者是此消彼長、緊密聯系的。

事實上,關于“自己旅游”的優點不止兩個,考生完全可以再增加一個段落繼續論述自己旅游的第三個優點,形成“四段論”的模式,這樣的論證無疑更具力量,效果更好。

什么是真正有意義的讓步?

需要注意的是,讓步并不等同于只是干巴巴地承認自身缺陷,而不作任何自圓其說的解釋。什么意思呢?假設某篇文章的立場是支持某個觀點,采用“三段論”的結構,其中有一個段落來進行讓步,可能有考生會相當“大方”地指出文章觀點存在的種種局限性,對其進行嚴肅的聲討。這種做法當然不可取,簡直就是大煞風景,給讀者一種“以己之矛,攻己之盾”的感覺,對于文章的主觀點來說無疑是嚴重的削弱,也不利于文中信息的準確表達,考試時一定要避免。真正意義上的良好讓步,除了坦承一些缺陷與不足之處,還應該進一步解釋強調它們是可以被克服的,問題并不大,或這些缺陷本身是暫時的,但從長遠利益看是有利的。這樣既體現了謙和的態度,也透露出一種更為成熟全面的思考角度。所以大家就知道了,讓步的時候需要拿捏好尺度,過猶不及。

下面是幾篇使用“讓步寫法”的范例。

題目:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to succeed, you should be more like others than be different from everyone else. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.

文章節選:

Admittedly, being unique risks rejection by those around us. That's why the majority of us tend to follow fashion trend and to listen the advice of others. However, too much imitating and conforming will finally overwhelm us, rendering our mind inept and incapable of independent thinking. To be successful and truly happy, one needs to chart out one's own course through life. Only with such attitude can one chase one's own dream toward success.

樂聞攜爾學生習作課后修改版本

題目:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.

文章節選:

Admittedly, people tend to be over-relaxed and less efficient when they work at home—no supervision from directors, no pressure from their diligent peers, and in the meantime more possibilities for leisure and entertainment, even the household chores can be distracting. But is this enough to deny working at home? Of course not. We can easily fight this by giving employees clear and exact task descriptions and deadlines and ask them to report their progress from time to time. We may also set some punishment rules for those who cannot finish the tasks well or cannot finish on time. In this way, the efficiency of working at home can be secured and we can better enjoy the benefits it brings.

樂聞攜爾學生習作課后修改版本

題目:

Some people prefer to work with others. Others prefer to work alone. Which way would you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your choice.

TOEFL: 2007.9.15

文章:

While it often depends on the kind of work at hand and the people with whom it must be done, I generally prefer to work alone. This is the nature of the work I like to do: writing, editing, figuring out solutions to issues, solving problems.

Working alone I can concentrate more deeply on the task at hand. I can control the work environment—either total silence or the background music I enjoy, in the most comfortable chair, in the best lighting, with the room temperature set just as I like, and in the most comfortable clothes—everything conducive to getting the work done without distraction, discomfort or interruptions.

When working with others, there tends to be more or less constant chatter and many other miscellaneous distractions—cell phone calls, attacks of coughing and sneezing, someone starts unconsciously humming off key, someone wants to have their special music playing, someone's stomach growls and all have to make their comic comments, someone wants to open or close a window, offers to make coffee or tea, etc. All this makes it difficult to enjoy sustained periods of the quiet needed for deep concentration to get the work done most expeditiously and correctly.

Though working with others provides more or less interesting opportunities for short relaxing breaks and it is good to have another at hand who knows the answer to some questions for which you can get a ready answer rather than having to look it up online or in a book, for the type of work I like to do, these do not outweigh the long, undisturbed periods of fruitful concentration in a comfortable environment possible when working alone.

《新托福真題詳解——寫作分卷(第一冊)》

講到這里,相信大家對“讓步寫法”已經有一個較為清楚且全面的認識了,平時可以留意訓練一下,牢牢掌握這個方法。

(2)居中寫法

討論完上述用“讓步寫法”處理的“一邊倒”文章之后,不知道大家有沒有思考過另外一種情形呢?即,事物本身是中性的,對人們的影響應具體情況具體分析。如此,我們可能對論述對象持“既不同意,也不反對”的態度,那么這種類型的文章觀點可以算作“明確”嗎?請注意我的回答“其實這種觀點也是非常明確的”。原因一目了然,態度很明確,就是要保持中立。這是我想重點強調的一點,希望大家也可以嘗試這種寫法。

事實上,我強烈建議各位以后參加諸如SAT和GRE等注重思辨性思維(critical thinking)的考試時,盡可能多地采用這種“明確但不極端”的觀點。因為“明確”只是意味著觀點本身清楚,而未必是必須倒向其中的某一方,居中型的觀點同樣能表明堅定的立場。而且,居中型的觀點更容易體現作者能客觀地看待事物。

當我們闡述一個居中型觀點時,顯然參與論述的信息就更多了——討論對象的優點和缺點全部囊括。如此,必然要從辯證的角度來分析信息。當我們嘗試用辯證的角度去寫文章的時候,文章無疑也就顯得更加嚴謹了。

我們來看一個范例吧。

題目:

In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists—people who can provide broad perspectives.

文章節選:

In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both positive and negative effects among persons in Western society call for a balance in which there are both specialists and generalists.

GRE寫作ISSUE官方給出的6分范文

這是一道作文題目以及ETS官方給出的一篇滿分范文的首段。題目給出的觀點是“當今社會中,各種專才被高估了,我們需要更多見識廣博的通才”,而范文首段在結尾處亮明了觀點——二者同等重要。也就是說考試的時候大家完全可以采取居中型觀點,ETS也不會不支持這種做法。

SAT和GRE等考試一直都在反復強調一個單詞,即“critical”(思辨性的),這一點在托福中也有類似的要求。如何使文章“critical”?它不但要求文章觀點明確,而且思路也應嚴謹,這顯然對考生的寫作能力以及思考能力提出了更高的要求。寫一篇“明確”的文章,易,無非就是開門見山,亮明觀點,任何一篇非居中型文章都可以做到。然而,寫一篇“明確且嚴謹”的文章,難!因為在一篇文章中,“明確”和“嚴謹”往往很難同時體現出來。一般來說,非居中型文章會讓人感覺很簡單,信息量小,甚至非常“shallow”和“superficial”,尤其是“一邊倒”的極端型文章,思維單薄。我們當然更希望“rater”(閱卷老師)會認為我們的文章不但層次多樣,而且結構嚴謹,確實是經過一番冥思苦想的,因此我們應盡量使之厚實豐滿一些。如面對同一個作文題目,甲同學的觀點是“同意”,這樣寫出來的文章無疑很明確,但是在層次上就不夠多樣了,體現不了考生較強的思辨性。而乙同學卻聰明地選擇了“既不同意,也不反對”作為中心論點,其實這樣有利于把文章的結構寫得足夠復雜,因為選材的空間和延伸的方向更多元了。我希望大家對待一個特定的考試(比如GRE或者SAT[1])時會特意構造較為復雜的文章,而后精心打磨,使其明確起來。

具體來講,什么時候推薦采用“居中寫法”呢?我們可以分成兩種情況。

情況一:兩個事物進行比較時,無法簡單地判定哪個更好或哪個更差時,可采用“居中寫法”。

情況二:一個事物如果優點和缺點各占一半,沒有明顯的好,也沒有明顯的壞時,我們也提倡“居中寫法”。

因為將兩個事物A和B進行比較時,會分別列出A和B的優缺點,進行比較。在有些情況下,A的優點大于B,而有些情況下,A的優點小于B,或A的缺點大于B,我們無法簡單地傾向于A或B,這時如果我們不分情況,只是簡單地說A好(B不好)或B好(A不好),都欠妥。因此提倡“居中寫法”,其實也就是對A和B都不偏向。分析一個事物的優缺點時同樣如此。

針對這兩種情況,該怎樣采用居中寫法來寫呢?下面我用具體的例子來說明。

情況一:“Are parents the best teachers?” 這道題目中有比較關系嗎?是有的,雖然最高級的出現并沒有明確直觀地給出相比較的兩方。這時,我們需要自己把與題目中所給一方相對的另一方或幾方找出來,即,把比較關系和對象“具體化”。針對這道題,可以給“父母”(parents)找一個比較對象,如“學校教師”。如此一來,話題就變成了將“父母”和“學校教師”對孩子的影響進行比較,分析孰輕孰重。如果我們認為二者各有所長,就可以采用“居中寫法”。文章的中心論點則為“父母在有些方面是孩子最好的老師,但在有些方面卻不是”。“父母”是孩子最早的老師,對孩子的品性和性格最有影響力,能夠為孩子樹立榜樣,培養孩子善良、頑強、堅持不懈等品格,并且在生活方面與孩子有很多接觸,能夠顧及他們生活上遇到的困難并教他們克服。但是和“學校教師”相比,“父母”的局限性在于他們缺乏專業知識和專業的教育方法等,導致在專業方面,家長無法成為最理想的老師。最終總結“在生活和品格方面,父母是孩子最好的老師;但是在專業方面,學校教師更好,所以我們不能籠統地說父母是孩子最好的老師”。

情況二:“Has technology made the world a better place to live in?”題目問“科技有沒有將世界變得更好”,意思是科技是否具備將世界變好的優勢,其實也就是將科技本身的優點和缺點進行比較,在對優缺參半的事物進行評論時,最好采用“居中寫法”。首先中心論點是“科技在有些方面確實使世界變得更美好了,但在有些方面卻使世界變得更糟糕了”。在接下來的論證過程中,正面論據包括“科技的發展使得一些以前無法治愈的疾病得到了更好的治療”以及“科技的發展使得糧食產量大幅提升”等;而負面論據包括“科技發展對人類帶來了威脅或潛在風險,如食品安全問題、電磁輻射等”,“科技的進步加快了工業化的進程,使得環境污染更加嚴重,破壞了人類的居住環境”等。結論:“不能簡單地說科技使世界更美好或者更糟糕了,我們需要一分為二地看待這個問題。”

下面這篇文章可供考生參考。

題目:

Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

TOEFL: 2008.3.15

文章:

I do not agree that human needs for land are more important than saving land for endangered animals. In my personal view, both human needs and protecting endangered animals are equally important.

Human needs for land are very important in order to give people good lives and support the development of society. For instance, as the population increases, more homes need to be built and more factories and power stations are required to supply the goods and energy that people need. More farmland is needed to produce food. If we do not convert land use for these purposes, many people will suffer and have bad lives.

On the other hand, saving land to protect endangered animals is also very important, not just because animals add variety and beauty to the world, but because animals make an important contribution to humans' quality of life. Animals are part of the ecosystem that purifies the air, cleans the water, and provides humans with food. If we allow the animals to become extinct, we will damage the ecosystems and lose these vital services. This will have a bad impact on the development of society.

Clearly, it is impossible to say that either aspect is more important as they both have a significant impact on the quality of people's lives. Furthermore, there is no need to choose between providing for humans and protecting animals because, the way I see it, the problem is not a shortage of land. The problem is that people see the short-term benefit of, say, cutting down a rainforest for farmland but they do not see the long-term economic benefit of protecting animals. Governments need to educate people to see the equal value of both and then we can develop society without destroying the natural world.

《新托福真題詳解——寫作分卷(第一冊)》

上面這篇文章對“把土地用于人類需要”和“保留土地來挽救瀕危動物”兩個做法做了對比。文章首段先亮明觀點,二者同等重要。二、三段則分別從土地對人類需求的重要性、保留土地對保護瀕危動物的重要性兩個方面論述兩者不分伯仲。最后一段總結觀點,再次點題。這是一篇典型的采用“居中寫法”的范文。


注釋

[1]等以后有機會的時候, 再跟大家詳細地討論GRE和SAT的寫作需要注意哪些事情, 在這里就不贅述了。

主站蜘蛛池模板: 铜山县| 光山县| 卫辉市| 务川| 桑植县| 衡东县| 南靖县| 永康市| 新巴尔虎左旗| 本溪市| 金昌市| 习水县| 靖安县| 和顺县| 陆河县| 云霄县| 宜宾市| 霍山县| 会宁县| 宣威市| 高淳县| 莎车县| 阜南县| 四川省| 临西县| 德格县| 依安县| 上林县| 霍城县| 富锦市| 库伦旗| 潍坊市| 蓬溪县| 大足县| 武川县| 乾安县| 惠安县| 布拖县| 沅江市| 永城市| 澄迈县|