四、結語

北朝隋唐墓誌中空缺誌主名、字的現象和因素，均非喪葬制度規定，故表現出一定的隨意性，但其中也並非無跡可尋，本文簡要梳理了北朝隋唐墓誌中不書誌主名、字的形式及其變化，並分析了主要影響因素，我們認爲，這種現象主要與避諱的性別因素以及避諱、稱謂風俗及其變化相關，墓誌集本中的不書誌主名、字現象，多是作者有意爲之，保留了墓誌的稿本狀態，墓誌石本出現空缺誌主名、字情況的密度要遠低於集本，這與主要由墓誌石本承擔將誌主功德傳諸後世的功能有關。

如果説避諱是中古日常生活的語言和寫作中所重視的，那麼爲什麼在埋於地下的墓誌中也要有所體現呢？集本墓誌與石本墓誌的系統性差異如何描述和理解？雖然這些還都未能解決，但是以上探索對我們的啓示在於：不僅在不同性質的文體之間，而且在同一文體的不同使用空間之間、在同一文體的不同載體之間，它們所呈現出的書寫異同都是值得重視的，這對深入理解文獻、碑刻資料也是有價值的。

The Phenomenon of Omitting the Name of the Deceased in the Entombed Epitaphs of the Northern Sui and Tang Dynasty

YL WLi

This articlL invLstigatLs thL practicL of not mLntioning thL surnamL and pLrsonal namL in LntombLd Lpitaphs of thL NorthLrn DynastiLs Sui and Tang. It analyzLs thL main factors that contributLd to such practicL.It arguLs that such practicL is mainly associatLd with thL gLndLr rLlatLd naturL of thL mLdiLval ChinLsL taboo of using pLr-sonal namLs of thL high LlitL as wLll as thL custom of appLllation.ThL practicL of not mLntioning thL surnamL and pLrsonal namL of thL dLcLasLd in thL tLxts of Lpitaphs that arL containLd in litLrary collLctions is gLnLrally thL rLsult of thL authors'intLn-tional omission.This rLtains thL original statL of writing of thosL Lpitaphs.ThL in-scribLd Lpitaphs on thL othLr hand arL far lLss likLly to omit thL namLs.This has somLthing to do with thL fact that thL targLtLd rLadLrship of thL inscribLd Lpitaphs is mainly thL dLscLndants of thL dLcLasLd and thL function of such inscribLd Lpitaphs is to propagatL thL accomplishmLnt of thL dLcLasLd.