官术网_书友最值得收藏!

IPv6

Although IPv4 seems to permit a large address space, freely available IP addresses were exhausted several years ago, forcing the employment of NAT to increase the number of available addresses. A more permanent solution has been found in the adoption of an improved IP addressing scheme, IPv6. Although it constitutes less than five percent of internet addresses, its usage is increasing, and penetration testers must be prepared to address the differences between IPv4 and IPv6. In IPv6, the source and destination addresses are 128 bits in length, yielding 2128 possible addresses, that is, 340 undecillion addresses!

The increased size of the addressable address space presents some problems for penetration testers, particularly when using scanners that step through the available address space looking for live servers. However, some features of the IPv6 protocol have simplified discovery, especially the use of ICMPv6 to identify active link-local addresses.

It is important to consider IPv6 when conducting initial scans for the following reasons:

  • There is uneven support for IPv6 functionality in testing tools, so testers must ensure that each tool is validated to determine their performance and accuracy in IPv4, IPv6, and mixed networks.
  • Because IPv6 is a relatively new protocol, the target network may contain misconfigurations that leak important data; testers must be prepared to recognize and use this information.
  • Older network controls (firewalls, IDS, and IPS) may not detect IPv6. In such cases, penetration testers can use IPv6 tunnels to maintain covert communications with the network, and exfiltrate the data undetected.
主站蜘蛛池模板: 常山县| 巩留县| 昭苏县| 海阳市| 朝阳区| 西藏| 九龙城区| 都昌县| 璧山县| 财经| 富源县| 台北县| 泸州市| 南靖县| 富平县| 荃湾区| 红安县| 高清| 界首市| 邵阳县| 二连浩特市| 江西省| 龙里县| 宜春市| 邳州市| 石景山区| 车险| 思南县| 驻马店市| 新巴尔虎左旗| 德令哈市| 彝良县| 瓮安县| 大渡口区| 济阳县| 怀远县| 巴楚县| 长兴县| 益阳市| 南投县| 兰西县|