Combining grouping sets with the FILTER clause

In real-world applications, grouping sets can often be combined with FILTER clauses. The idea behind the FILTER clause is to be able to run partial aggregates.

Here is an example:

test=# SELECT region, 
  avg(production) AS all, 
  avg(production) FILTER (WHERE year  < 1990) AS old,  
  avg(production) FILTER (WHERE year  >= 1990) AS new  
FROM t_oil 
GROUP BY ROLLUP (region); 
    region     | all            | old            | new 
---------------+----------------+----------------+---------------- 
 Middle East   | 1992.603686635 | 1747.325892857 | 2254.233333333 
 North America | 4541.362318840 | 4471.653333333 | 4624.349206349 
               | 2607.513986013 | 2430.685618729 | 2801.183150183 
(3 rows) 

The idea here is that not all columns will use the same data for aggregation. The FILTER clauses allow you to selectively pass data to those aggregates. In my example, the second aggregate will only consider data before 1990, while the third aggregate will take care of more recent data.

FILTER works for all kinds of aggregates and offers a simple way to pivot your data. Also, FILTER is faster than mimicking the same behavior with CASE WHEN ... THEN NULL ... ELSE END. You can find some real performance comparison here: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com/en/postgresql-9-4-aggregation-filters-they-do-pay-off/.