- Hands-On Reactive Programming with Python
- Romain Picard
- 351字
- 2021-06-24 18:25:19
Functional reactive programming
The time has come to detail how to structure ReactiveX code in a functional way. It is tempting to name code designed this way functional reactive programming (FRP). Even though this name seems natural, it would be incorrectly named. FRP is something that was described by Conal Elliott in 1997 in a paper named Functional Reactive Animation. Functional reactive programming, as described by Conal Elliott, is composed of two types of values:
- Events that correspond to real events, or generated ones
- Behaviors that vary other continuous time
Events are the types of values that are implemented in ReactiveX observables. They can correspond to real events such as mouse location changes, some key presses on a keyboard, or a read operation that completes. Events are used to represent discrete values that change at specific times.
On the other hand, behaviors represent a value that is dependent on the time. So it is basically a formula, or a function, that is applied to the time. Behaviors always have a value, and they are used to represent continuous values depending on the current time. Behaviors are not available in ReactiveX. By the way, behaviors, as defined in the original paper, are available in no framework. This is due to the fact that the notion of a continuous value on a computer system does not exist. Some frameworks approximate behaviors by implementing them via sampling (that is, polling).
Since FRP is definitely not something that can be achieved with ReactiveX, writing functional code on top of a reactive framework should not be named FRP. However, with reactive programming and functional programming being more and more popular, and as they are more and more combined, this is often a source of confusion. The number of questions related to this on development discussion channels confirms this. Another similar name is used by several libraries: functional and reactive programming (FARP). The difference is both subtle and very clear: FARP is not FRP, but reactive code written in a functional way. This is the terminology that will be used in this book.
- 精通Linux內核開發
- 曝光:Linux企業運維實戰
- SharePoint 2013 WCM Advanced Cookbook
- 開源安全運維平臺OSSIM疑難解析:入門篇
- 異質結原理與器件
- AWS Development Essentials
- INSTANT Migration from Windows Server 2008 and 2008 R2 to 2012 How-to
- Social Data Visualization with HTML5 and JavaScript
- CentOS 6 Linux Server Cookbook
- Raspberry Pi入門指南
- Zabbix監控系統之深度解析和實踐
- Office 365 User Guide
- Responsive Web Design by Example:Beginner's Guide(Second Edition)
- Windows10開發入門經典
- 操作系統實用教程