官术网_书友最值得收藏!

Comparing two proportions

Sometimes, we may want to compare two proportions from two populations. Crucially, we will assume that they are independent of each other. It's difficult to analytically compute the probability that one proportion is less than another, so we often rely on Monte Carlo methods, otherwise known as simulation or random sampling.

We randomly generate the two proportions from their respective posterior distributions, and then track how often one is less than the other. We use the frequency we observed in our simulation to estimate the desired probability.

So, let's see this in action; we have two parameters: θA and θB. These correspond to the proportion of individuals who click on an ad from format A or format B. Users are randomly assigned to one format or the other, and the website tracks how many viewers click on the ad in the different formats.

516 visitors saw format A and 108 of them clicked it. 510 visitors saw format B and 144 of them clicked it. We use the same prior for both θA and θB, which is beta (3, 3). Additionally, the posterior distribution for θA will be B (111, 411) and for θB, it will be B (147, 369). This results in the following output:

We now want to know the probability of θA being less than θBthis is difficult to compute analytically. We can randomly simulate θA and θB, and then use that to estimate this probability. So, let's randomly simulate one θA, as follows:

Then, randomly simulate one θB, as follows:

Finally, we're going to do 1,000 simulations by computing 1,000 θA values and 1,000 θB values, as follows:

This is what we end up with; here, we can see how often θA is less than θB, that is, θwas 996 times less than θB. So, what's the average of this? Well, it is 0.996; this is the probability that θA is less than θB, or an estimate of that probability. Given this, it seems highly likely that more people clicked on the ad for format B than people who clicked on the ad for format A.

That's it for proportions. Next up, we will look at Bayesian methods for analyzing the means of quantitative data.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 松桃| 雅安市| 蕉岭县| 江华| 都安| 巴东县| 灌南县| 阿克陶县| 兴安县| 新乡市| 蓝山县| 含山县| 巴彦淖尔市| 五台县| 左贡县| 鹰潭市| 始兴县| 陕西省| 海淀区| 繁昌县| 广安市| 望江县| 绥芬河市| 南木林县| 唐河县| 册亨县| 昭苏县| 福建省| 双城市| 海城市| 河津市| 招远市| 田阳县| 辉县市| 石城县| 霍邱县| 徐水县| 封丘县| 建德市| 凉山| 崇州市|