官术网_书友最值得收藏!

Comparing two proportions

Sometimes, we may want to compare two proportions from two populations. Crucially, we will assume that they are independent of each other. It's difficult to analytically compute the probability that one proportion is less than another, so we often rely on Monte Carlo methods, otherwise known as simulation or random sampling.

We randomly generate the two proportions from their respective posterior distributions, and then track how often one is less than the other. We use the frequency we observed in our simulation to estimate the desired probability.

So, let's see this in action; we have two parameters: θA and θB. These correspond to the proportion of individuals who click on an ad from format A or format B. Users are randomly assigned to one format or the other, and the website tracks how many viewers click on the ad in the different formats.

516 visitors saw format A and 108 of them clicked it. 510 visitors saw format B and 144 of them clicked it. We use the same prior for both θA and θB, which is beta (3, 3). Additionally, the posterior distribution for θA will be B (111, 411) and for θB, it will be B (147, 369). This results in the following output:

We now want to know the probability of θA being less than θBthis is difficult to compute analytically. We can randomly simulate θA and θB, and then use that to estimate this probability. So, let's randomly simulate one θA, as follows:

Then, randomly simulate one θB, as follows:

Finally, we're going to do 1,000 simulations by computing 1,000 θA values and 1,000 θB values, as follows:

This is what we end up with; here, we can see how often θA is less than θB, that is, θwas 996 times less than θB. So, what's the average of this? Well, it is 0.996; this is the probability that θA is less than θB, or an estimate of that probability. Given this, it seems highly likely that more people clicked on the ad for format B than people who clicked on the ad for format A.

That's it for proportions. Next up, we will look at Bayesian methods for analyzing the means of quantitative data.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 呈贡县| 天镇县| 安徽省| 宝丰县| 八宿县| 丰台区| 天长市| 富裕县| 崇州市| 台山市| 册亨县| 泸定县| 徐闻县| 将乐县| 灌南县| 清水河县| 冀州市| 望都县| 安多县| 庐江县| 平昌县| 郑州市| 彰化县| 沂水县| 阿城市| 商南县| 江都市| 重庆市| 蛟河市| 苍梧县| 渭南市| 英超| 东光县| 七台河市| 罗山县| 翁源县| 镇康县| 石家庄市| 丰县| 比如县| 安宁市|