官术网_书友最值得收藏!

Comparing EDA with classical and Bayesian analysis

There are several approaches to data analysis. The most popular ones that are relevant to this book are the following:

Classical data analysis: For the classical data analysis approach, the problem definition and data collection step are followed by model development, which is followed by analysis and result communication. 

Exploratory data analysis approach: For the EDA approach, it follows the same approach as classical data analysis except the model imposition and the data analysis steps are swapped. The main focus is on the data, its structure, outliers, models, and visualizations. Generally, in EDA, we do not impose any deterministic or probabilistic models on the data.

Bayesian data analysis approach: The Bayesian approach incorporates prior probability distribution knowledge into the analysis steps as shown in the following diagram. Well, simply put, prior probability distribution of any quantity expresses the belief about that particular quantity before considering some evidence. Are you still lost with the term prior probability distribution? Andrew Gelman has a very descriptive paper about prior probability distribution. The following diagram shows three different approaches for data analysis illustrating the difference in their execution steps:

Data analysts and data scientists freely mix steps mentioned in the preceding approaches to get meaningful insights from the data. In addition to that, it is essentially difficult to judge or estimate which model is best for data analysis. All of them have their paradigms and are suitable for different types of data analysis. 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 高雄市| 宁强县| 广州市| 兴义市| 西丰县| 中江县| 辛集市| 溧阳市| 威信县| 甘孜| 崇仁县| 黔西县| 永昌县| 台湾省| 漠河县| 邵武市| 兴山县| 青州市| 泗水县| 吉水县| 同江市| 巴林左旗| 辽源市| 宣城市| 忻州市| 自贡市| 太康县| 枞阳县| 扶风县| 民县| 宁城县| 马关县| 思茅市| 定陶县| 南投市| 衡东县| 天镇县| 宜宾市| 长汀县| 互助| 永济市|