官术网_书友最值得收藏!

Threat modeling application in Kubernetes

Now that we have looked at threats in a Kubernetes cluster, let's move on to discuss how threat modeling will differ for an application deployed on Kubernetes. Deployment in Kubernetes adds additional complexities to the threat model. Kubernetes adds additional considerations, assets, threat actors, and new security controls that need to be considered before investigating the threats to the deployed application.

Let's look at a simple example of a three-tier web application:

Figure 3.4 – Threat model of a traditional web application

The same application looks a little different in the Kubernetes environment:

Figure 3.5 – Threat model of the three-tier web application in Kubernetes

As shown in the previous diagram, the web server, application server, and databases are all running inside pods. Let's do a high-level comparison of threat modeling between traditional web architecture and cloud-native architecture:

To summarize the preceding comparison, you will find that more assets need to be protected in a cloud-native architecture, and you will face more threat actors in this space. Kubernetes provides more security controls, but it also adds more complexity. More security controls doesn't necessarily mean more security. Remember: complexity is the enemy of security.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 灵台县| 瑞金市| 滨州市| 岱山县| 巫山县| 定西市| 朔州市| 都江堰市| 张家川| 建昌县| 盐津县| 环江| 精河县| 潞西市| 江安县| 渝北区| 龙井市| 二连浩特市| 蕉岭县| 宿迁市| 宝山区| 康平县| 康平县| 申扎县| 图们市| 象州县| 镇赉县| 文山县| 西藏| 德庆县| 陵川县| 塔城市| 永嘉县| 临洮县| 滨海县| 峨山| 吉安市| 曲靖市| 蕉岭县| 凯里市| 万荣县|