官术网_书友最值得收藏!

Differences between Strict Routing and Loose Routing

Loose and strict are different methods of routing SIP messages. Loose routing is new in SIP version 2. When you use loose routing, the R-URI is never changed and backwards compatibility is maintained with the older method (strict routing RFC2543).

The problem with strict routing is in the process of specifying the entire proxy set in the initial request before starting the SIP dialog. The processing throws away the information contained in the received R-URI. The behavior of UAs with outbound-proxy was problematic. The whole system would fail if there was a failure in one of the elements.

Differences between Strict Routing and Loose Routing

The solution, is that loose routing is the correct method. It keeps the target separated from the route. It allows each destination to route the packet and has a mechanism to keep backward compatibility with strict routing. The support of loose routing is indicated by the parameter ;lr.

Differences between Strict Routing and Loose Routing

When the SIP server receives a message, it can decide if it wants to stay in the middle or not (record-route). If the SIP server does not want to stay in the middle, it can pass the information to the user agents' UAs to connect each other. After this process the messages follow between the user agents.

If OpenSER wants to stay in the middle of the conversation (that is, for billing purposes) it should insert a ROUTE header field using the function record_route().

主站蜘蛛池模板: 迁西县| 景洪市| 赤壁市| 宜宾县| 靖远县| 丁青县| 福贡县| 涪陵区| 望江县| 崇礼县| 白水县| 任丘市| 始兴县| 定远县| 思南县| 宝应县| 阿合奇县| 耒阳市| 汉沽区| 德江县| 景宁| 修水县| 三原县| 荃湾区| 金堂县| 中山市| 莱西市| 夹江县| 石林| 盐池县| 潞城市| 博客| 牙克石市| 汝南县| 凭祥市| 文昌市| 连江县| 新昌县| 盐城市| 奉贤区| 顺平县|