本書選譯了6篇與米蘭達規則相關的論文，出版需要獲得全部論文原文版權方的授權。譯者在此過程中付出了大量的心血，如仍有未盡之處，請及時與譯者或出版社溝通授權及其他相關事宜?，F將本書所譯論文及其版權聲明按照本書的篇章順序集中列明，作為對原文作者、出版機構及版權代理機構授權的感謝，也方便讀者查閱。

第一章 90年代的警察審訊——米蘭達規則影響的實證研究

Paul G. Cassell&Bret S. Hayman, “ Police Interrogation in the 1990s: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Miran-da”, 43 UCLA Law Review 839 (1996).

Reprinted with permission. Translated by Liu Fangquan with permission from Paul G. Cassell.

第二章 米蘭達規則的社會成本:一個經驗性重估

Paul G. Cassell, “Miranda's Social Costs: An Empirical Reassessment”, 90 Northwestern University Law Review, 387(1996).

Reprinted with permission. Translated by Liu Fangquan with permission from Paul G. Cassell.

第三章 銬上警察——米蘭達規則對執法活動的消極影響之三十年回顧

Paul G. Cassell&Richard Fowles, “Handcuffing the Cops: A Thirty-Year Perspective on Miranda's Harmful Effects on Law Enforcement”, 50 Stanford Law Review 1055(1998).

Reprinted by permission.

第四章 “米蘭達案”四十年:為何需要、如何達致——以及圍繞著米蘭達規則發生的一切

Yale Kamisar, “On the Fortieth Anniversary of the Miranda Case: Why We Needed It, How We Got It—And What Happened to It?” 5 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 163(2007).

Reprinted with permission. Translated by Liu Fangquan with permission from Yale Kamisar.

第五章 警察的手是不是還被銬著——米蘭達規則妨礙警察執法效果的經驗性證據之五十年回顧

Paul Cassell & Richard Fowles, “ Still Handcuffing the Cops? A Review of Fifty Years of Empirical Evidence of Miranda's Harmful Effects on Law Enforcement”, 97 Bost. U. L. Rev. 685 (2017).

Reprinted with permission. Translated by Liu Fangquan with permission from Yale Kamisar and Boston University Law Review.

第六章 米蘭達規則削弱了警察的執法效果嗎?

John J. Donohue III, “Did Miranda Diminish Police Effectiveness?”, 50 Stanford Law Review 1147(1998).

Reprinted by permission.